Almanac
on
Sep 17, 2024
Something we’re seeing more and more of is the ‘customizable’ site. Most often, this means a button to swap between dark and light themes, but the options are starting to get increasingly sophisticated.
In this set, we have dark and light options, images and text-only options, color changes, whole theme change options, a custom text option, and even image editing options. This type of interaction differs from event-triggered animations and transitions. For the best effect, simplicity in layout is usually best, as is the case with these examples. Enjoy!
Luxury chocolate brand Montezuma’s has updated its website to improve the user experience. The color scheme and casual typeface match the product packaging, which in turn reflects the company’s ethical brand identity.
The type choices add crispness and modernity to this predominantly black and white design for Sake High. The contrast adds extra depth to the occasional color photos.
This is a fun little site with the serious intention of reducing stress. It has been established that micro-interactions and feedback make users feel good, and that is what Confetti Therapy is all about: click a button and pop some confetti from the direction of your choice.
The animation on this architectural firm’s site, particularly the transitions, makes for a really pleasing user experience. The fresh yellow accent color adds zest to the clean layout.
High quality photographs are cleverly combined with mockups to allow the user to visualize the product as it could be. Information is available but broken into small chunks to let the images take the lead.
Following Wildfire is a now sadly all too rare example of social media, technology, and good design combining to make something that is genuinely useful. Publicly available photos are scanned for signs of potential wildfire and added to the interactive map.
Sound Ethics advocates for artists’ rights and new standards for ethical AI. Their aim is not to exclude AI but to make it work for musicians and artists instead of against them. The site makes a statement with dark background images contrasted with neon yellow-green.
The pixelated images resolving to 3D models of products are an appealing feature here. On scroll animation helps to keep the user feeling engaged.
The architecture for this restaurant chain website does a good job of centralizing content that applies to all its branches – for example, menus – while at the same time allowing each branch its own identity.
Orken is a new fantasy portrayed across different media and is due to launch soon on Kickstarter. This teaser site provides sample illustrations and video clips and offers just enough information to intrigue the user.
Cotton candy pink and smiley faces might not seem the obvious choice for an agency with the word ‘serious’ in its name, but actually, the contradiction works really well here.
This teaser page for The Cure’s new album harks back to a time when it was deemed acceptable to let users play about and discover things for themselves. It’s simple but fun and more intriguing than the usual ‘big red button’ CTAs.
This is a resource hub for Stripe developers, with videos, articles, and community links. It’s also a lot of fun. The default styling is basic black and white with highlighter highlights, but there is a console that allows you to mess about with everything that isn’t actual practical content. And play snake.
Branding agency Treize Grammes re-designed their site to meet changes they had experienced in their business. The result is well structured and indicates a high level of competence. The choice of colors and the sliding switch motif add personality and approachableness.
The Netlify platform is celebrating reaching 5 million developers with this interactive game. Each waypoint in the game reveals a piece of Netifly’s story so far.
This site for market research agency Sonder combines bright colors with crisp type and a clean layout to create a look that is confident and positive in tone.
Brutalist lives on in this visually basic but also pleasing site for design and technology studio Printer Scanner. Clicking on the logotype swaps the overall theme randomly between two dark versions and two light versions.
This is a well-structured portfolio site with a clean layout and intuitive flow. As an extra demonstration of the subject’s frontend development skills, there are options to switch between dark or light mode, images or text only mode, and color or grayscale.
Unsurprisingly perhaps, photographs are the dominant element in this site for surfer and snowboarder Mathieu Crepel. Photographs are even used for the menu instead of the usual text or icons. It’s unusual, but it works here.
The concept behind PackBags is customized bags put together from a set of components (body, strap, carabiner) chosen by the customer. The site is clear and easy to follow, and the configurator is very user-friendly.
CSS gradients have been so long that there’s no need to rehash what they are and how to use them. You have surely encountered them at some point in your front-end journey, and if you follow me, you also know that I use them all the time. I use them for CSS patterns, nice CSS decorations, and even CSS loaders. But even so, gradients have a tough syntax that can get very complicated very quickly if you’re not paying attention.
In this article, we are not going to make complex stuff with CSS gradients. Instead, we’re keeping things simple and I am going to walk through all of the incredible things we can do with just one gradient.
Only one gradient? In this case, reading the doc should be enough, no?
No, not really. Follow along and you will see that gradients are easy at their most basic, but are super powerful if we push them — or in this case, just one — to their limits.
One of the first things you learn with gradients is that we can establish repeatable patterns with them. You’ve probably seen some examples of checkerboard patterns in the wild. That’s something we can quickly pull off with a single CSS gradient. In this case, we can reach for the repeating-conic-gradient()
function:
background:
repeating-conic-gradient(#000 0 25%, #fff 0 50%)
0 / 100px 100px;
A more verbose version of that without the background
shorthand:
background-image: repeating-conic-gradient(#000 0 25%, #fff 0 50%);
background-size: 100px 100px;
Either way, the result is the same:
Pretty simple so far, right? You have two colors that you can easily swap out for other colors, plus the background-size
property to control the square shapes.
If we change the color stops — where one color stops and another starts — we get another cool pattern based on triangles:
background:
repeating-conic-gradient(#000 0 12.5%, #fff 0 25%)
0 / 100px 100px;
If you compare the CSS for the two demos we’ve seen so far, you’ll see that all I did was divide the color stops in half, 25%
to 12.5%
and 50%
to 25%
.
Another one? Let’s go!
This time I’m working with CSS variables. I like this because variables make it infinitely easier to configure the gradients by updating a few values without actually touching the syntax. The calculation is a little more complex this time around, as it relies on trigonometric functions to get accurate values.
I know what you are thinking: Trigonometry? That sounds hard. That is certainly true, particularly if you’re new to CSS gradients. A good way to visualize the pattern is to disable the repetition using the no-repeat
value. This isolates the pattern to one instance so that you clearly see what’s getting repeated. The following example declares background-image
without a background-size
so you can see the tile that repeats and better understand each gradient:
I want to avoid a step-by-step tutorial for each and every example we’re covering so that I can share lots more examples without getting lost in the weeds. Instead, I’ll point you to three articles you can refer to that get into those weeds and allow you to pick apart our examples.
I’ll also encourage you to open my online collection of patterns for even more examples. Most of the examples are made with multiple gradients, but there are plenty that use only one. The goal of this article is to learn a few “single gradient” tricks — but the ultimate goal is to be able to combine as many gradients as possible to create cool stuff!
Let’s start with the following example:
You might claim that this belongs under “Patterns” — and you are right! But let’s make it more flexible by adding variables for controlling the thickness and the total number of cells. In other words, let’s create a grid!
.grid-lines {
--n: 3; /* number of rows */
--m: 5; /* number of columns */
--s: 80px; /* control the size of the grid */
--t: 2px; /* the thickness */
width: calc(var(--m)*var(--s) + var(--t));
height: calc(var(--n)*var(--s) + var(--t));
background:
conic-gradient(from 90deg at var(--t) var(--t), #0000 25%, #000 0)
0 0/var(--s) var(--s);
}
First of all, let’s isolate the gradient to better understand the repetition (like we did in the previous section).
One repetition will give us a horizontal and a vertical line. The size of the gradient is controlled by the variable --s
, so we define the width and height as a multiplier to get as many lines as we want to establish the grid pattern.
What’s with “
+ var(--t)
” in the equation?
The grid winds up like this without it:
We are missing lines at the right and the bottom which is logical considering the gradient we are using. To fix this, the gradient needs to be repeated one more time, but not at full size. For this reason, we are adding the thickness to the equation to have enough space for the extra repetition and the get the missing lines.
And what about a responsive configuration where the number of columns depends on the available space? We remove the --m
variable and define the width like this:
width: calc(round(down, 100%, var(--s)) + var(--t));
Instead of multiplying things, we use the round()
function to tell the browser to make the element full width and round the value to be a multiple of --s
. In other words, the browser will find the multiplier for us!
Resize the below and see how the grid behaves:
In the future, we will also be able to do this with the calc-size()
function:
width: calc-size(auto, round(down, size, var(--s)) + var(--t));
Using calc-size()
is essentially the same as the last example, but instead of using 100%
we consider auto
to be the width value. It’s still early to adopt such syntax. You can test the result in the latest version of Chrome at the time of this writing:
Let’s try something different: vertical (or horizontal) dashed lines where we can control everything.
.dashed-lines {
--t: 2px; /* thickness of the lines */
--g: 50px; /* gap between lines */
--s: 12px; /* size of the dashes */
background:
conic-gradient(at var(--t) 50%, #0000 75%, #000 0)
var(--g)/calc(var(--g) + var(--t)) var(--s);
}
Can you figure out how it works? Here is a figure with hints:
Try creating the horizontal version on your own. Here’s a demo that shows how I tackled it, but give it a try before peeking at it.
What about a grid with dashed lines — is that possible?
Yes, but using two gradients instead of one. The code is published over at my collection of CSS shapes. And yes, the responsive behavior is there as well!
How would you create the following gradient in CSS?
You might start by picking as many color values along the rainbow as you can, then chaining them in a linear-gradient
:
linear-gradient(90deg, red, yellow, green, /* etc. */, red);
Good idea, but it won’t get you all the way there. Plus, it requires you to juggle color stops and fuss with them until you get things just right.
There is a simpler solution. We can accomplish this with just one color!
background: linear-gradient(90deg in hsl longer hue, red 0 0);
I know, the syntax looks strange if you’re seeing the new color interpolation for the first time.
If I only declare this:
background: linear-gradient(90deg, red, red); /* or (90deg, red 0 0) */
…the browser creates a gradient that goes from red to red… red everywhere! When we set this “in hsl
“, we’re changing the color space used for the interpolation between the colors:
background: linear-gradient(90deg in hsl, red, red);
Now, the browser will create a gradient that goes from red to red… this time using the HSL color space rather than the default RGB color space. Nothing changes visually… still see red everywhere.
The longer hue
bit is what’s interesting. When we’re in the HSL color space, the hue channel’s value is an angle unit (e.g., 25deg
). You can see the HSL color space as a circle where the angle defines the position of the color within that circle.
Since it’s a circle, we can move between two points using a “short” path or “long” path.
If we consider the same point (red
in our case) it means that the “short” path contains only red and the “long” path runs into all the colors as it traverses the color space.
Adam Argyle published a very detailed guide on high-definition colors in CSS. I recommend reading it because you will find all the features we’re covering (this section in particular) to get more context on how everything comes together.
We can use the same technique to create a color wheel using a conic-gradient
:
background: conic-gradient(in hsl longer hue,red 0 0);
And while we are on the topic of CSS colors, I shared another fun trick that allows you to define an array of color values… yes, in CSS! And it only uses a single gradient as well.
Let’s do another exercise, this time working with hover effects. We tend to rely on pseudo-elements and extra elements when it comes to things like applying underlines and overlays on hover, and we tend to forget that gradients are equally, if not more, effective for getting the job done.
Case in point. Let’s use a single gradient to form an underline that slides on hover:
h3 {
background:
linear-gradient(#1095c1 0 0) no-repeat
var(--p,0) 100%/var(--p, 0) .1em;
transition: 0.4s, background-position 0s;
}
h3:hover {
--p: 100%;
}
You likely would have used a pseudo-element for this, right? I think that’s probably how most people would approach it. It’s a viable solution but I find that using a gradient instead results in cleaner, more concise CSS.
You might be interested in another article I wrote for CSS-Tricks where I use the same technique to create a wide variety of cool hover effects.
Creating shapes with gradients is my favorite thing to do in CSS. I’ve been doing it for what feels like forever and love it so much that I published a “Modern Guide for Making CSS Shapes” over at Smashing Magazine earlier this year. I hope you check it out not only to learn more tricks but to see just how many shapes we can create with such a small amount of code — many that rely only on a single CSS gradient.
Some of my favorites include zig-zag borders:
…and “scooped” corners:
…as well as sparkles:
…and common icons like the plus sign:
I won’t get into the details of creating these shapes to avoid making this article long and boring. Read the guide and visit my CSS Shape collection and you’ll have everything you need to make these, and more!
Let’s do one more before we put a cap on this. Earlier this year, I discovered how awesome the CSS border-image
property is for creating different kinds of decorations and shapes. And guess what? border-image
limits us to using just one gradient, so we are obliged to follow that restriction.
Again, just one gradient and we get a bunch of fun results. I’ll drop in my favorites like I did in the last section. Starting with a gradient overlay:
We can use this technique for a full-width background:
…as well as heading dividers:
…and even ribbons:
All of these have traditionally required hacks, magic numbers, and other workarounds. It’s awesome to see modern CSS making things more effortless. Go read my article on this topic to find all the interesting stuff you can make using border-image
.
I hope you enjoyed this collection of “single-gradient” tricks. Most folks I know tend to use gradients to create, well, gradients. But as we’ve seen, they are more powerful and can be used for lots of other things, like drawing shapes.
I like to add a reminder at the end of an article like this that the goal is not to restrict yourself to using one gradient. You can use more! The goal is to get a better handle on how gradients work and push them in interesting ways — that, in turn, makes us better at writing CSS. So, go forth and experiment — I’d love to see what you make!
CSS Tricks That Use Only One Gradient originally published on CSS-Tricks, which is part of the DigitalOcean family. You should get the newsletter.
More times than I can count, while writing, I get myself into random but interesting topics with little relation to the original post. In the end, I have to make the simple but painful choice of deleting or archiving hours of research and writing because I know most people click on a post with a certain expectation of what they’ll get, and I know it isn’t me bombing them with unrelated rants about CSS.
This happened to me while working on Monday’s article about at-rules. All I did there was focus on a number of recipes to test browser support for CSS at-rules. In the process, I began to realize, geez we have so many new at-rules — I wonder how many of them are from this year alone. That’s the rabbit hole I found myself in once I wrapped up the article I was working on.
And guess what, my hunch was right: 2024 has brought more at-rules than an entire decade of CSS.
It all started when I asked myself why we got a selector()
wrapper function for the @supports
at-rule but are still waiting for an at-rule()
version. I can’t pinpoint the exact reasoning there, but I’m certain rthere wasn’t much of a need to check the support of at-rules because, well, there weren’t that many of them — it’s just recently that we got a windfall of at-rules.
So, right around 1998 when the CSS 2 recommendation was released, @import
and @page
were the only at-rules that made it into the CSS spec. That’s pretty much how things remained until the CSS 2.1 recommendation in 2011 introduced @media
. Of course, there were other at-rules like — @font-face
, @namespace
and @keyframes
to name a few — that had already debuted in their own respective modules. By this time, CSS dropped semantic versioning, and the specification didn’t give a true picture of the whole, but rather individual modules organized by feature.
Random tangent: The last accepted consensus says we are at “CSS 3”, but that was a decade ago and some even say we should start getting into CSS 5. Wherever we are is beside the point, although it’s certainly a topic of discussion happening. Is it even useful to have a named version?
The @supports
at-rule was released in 2011 in CSS Conditional Rules Module Level 3 — Levels 1 and 2 don’t formally exist but refer to the original CSS 1 and 2 recommendations. We didn’t actually get support for it in most browsers until 2015, and at that time, the existing at-rules already had widespread support. The @supports
was only geared towards new properties and values, designed to test browser support for CSS features before attempting to apply styles.
As of today, we have a grand total of 18 at-rules in CSS that are supported by at least one major browser. If we look at the year each at-rule was initially defined in a CSSWG Working Draft, we can see they all have been published at a fairly consistent rate:
If we check the number of at-rules supported on each browser per year, however, we can see the massive difference in browser activity:
If we just focus on the last year a major browser shipped each at-rule, we will notice that 2024 has brought us a whopping seven at-rules to date!
I like little thought experiments like this. Something you’re researching leads to researching about the same topic; out of scope, but tangentially related. It may not be the sort of thing you bookmark and reference daily, but it is good cocktail chatter. If nothing else, it’s affirming the feeling that CSS is moving fast, like really fast in a way we haven’t seen since CSS 3 first landed.
It also adds context for the CSS features we have — and don’t have. There was no at-rule()
function initially because there weren’t many at-rules to begin with. Now that we’ve exploded with more new at-rules than the past decade combined, it may be no coincidence that just last week the Chrome Team updated the function’s status from New to Assigned!
One last note: the reason I’m even thinking about at-rules at all is that we’ve updated the CSS Almanac, expanding it to include more CSS features including at-rules. I’m trying to fill it up and you can always help by becoming a guest writer.
2024: More CSS At-Rules Than the Past Decade Combined originally published on CSS-Tricks, which is part of the DigitalOcean family. You should get the newsletter.
A WordPress theme that doesn’t look modern, doesn’t come with built-in flexibility, and with a developer that doesn’t support it can spell trouble for you down the line. Your website’s design needs to adapt and evolve alongside the business it represents.
A WordPress theme that doesn’t look modern, doesn’t come with built-in flexibility, and with a developer that doesn’t support it can spell trouble for you down the line. Your website’s design needs to adapt and evolve alongside the business it represents.
There are tens of thousands of WordPress themes available on the market. And there are new ones being developed every day. When it comes time to choose a theme for your website and brand, how do you decide which is the best from so many?
In the following review, you’ll discover the best WordPress themes for 2024. They include:
These tried and tested WordPress themes are the best of the best. If you’re looking for incredible designs, intuitive page builders, and feature-packed themes, keep reading.
What do all the top WordPress themes have in common?
There are certain traits that all the best WordPress themes share. Whether you’re looking for a theme for your new website or to replace an existing one, make sure your theme has the following:
User-friendliness: You might see a theme with the most incredible looking pre-built websites or demos. However, if it takes more than a minute to figure out how to edit that theme on the backend, that’s a major issue.
Page builder options: From WordPress’s own builder to Elementor, every page builder has its fans. Finding a WordPress theme that allows you to design and customize your website with an intuitive page builder is critical.
Customizability: One of the drawbacks to using a popular WordPress theme is that it can end up looking like other people’s websites. The best WordPress themes in 2024, however, include a wide variety of website demos. They also give you the ability to customize as much or as little of them as you want.
Design quality: Before you purchase or install a theme, take a look at the multipurpose demos it comes with. They should look like they were built today, not five years ago. You should also be able to find designs made for your niche (or something close to it).
Mobile editing: As more people scour the web from their smartphones, you can’t afford to have a site not built for their screens. While many of the top WordPress themes offer responsive demos, it’s just as important that the page builders have easy-to-use mobile editing tools.
Speed: Speed matters in a number of ways. For starters, your WordPress theme and page builders should load quickly. If you’re having to wait for each new screen to open, editing your site will quickly become a nightmare. Your website visitors will feel the same way if your beautiful web design takes too long to load.
Support: Even the most seasoned of designers need help from time to time. That’s why it’s crucial to use themes that are well-supported by their developers. That includes self-support options like user manuals and video tutorials as well as timely customer support from the theme developer.
Finding the perfect WordPress theme can feel like trying to find a needle in a haystack. The WordPress themes below, however, are the best of the best.
While you can’t go wrong with any of these themes, you might find that some of them are better suited to your current website needs than others. To help you narrow down the options, you’ll find information on their top features, the average customer rating, as well as what real users have to say about them.
TL;DR: UiCore PRO is a WordPress theme tailored explicitly for agencies looking to build unlimited websites under one yearly subscription.
UiCore PRO stands apart from the rest in the realm of WordPress themes. Crafted with agencies in mind, this theme offers unparalleled features designed to elevate your web design game and streamline your operations.
The Startup template, the epitome of sophistication, melds elegant design choices, boundary-pushing content structures, and captivating special effects, all culminating in an unrivaled user experience. Backed by a seamless backend interface, users revel in a hassle-free customization process, free from lag or errors, setting UiCore PRO leagues ahead of the competition.
Agencies looking for a game-changer in WordPress themes gravitate toward UiCore PRO for numerous reasons:
Experience the power of UiCore PRO – where unlimited website creation meets unparalleled innovation. Take charge of your agency’s digital landscape today.
Customer testimonial: “This is the most flexible yet powerful theme I’ve used. The use of Elementor with theme blocks and theme settings has let me completely recreate a website in 2 days.”
TL;DR: BeTheme is the best WordPress theme for designers who want one theme for all their websites.
BeTheme is a WordPress theme and page builder all rolled in one. If you’re looking for a powerhouse that will allow you to come up with something original and impressive for your own site or for your clients, you’ve found it.
BeTheme comes with more than 700 pre-built websites. New websites are released monthly, so you’ll always have new, modern designs like BeFurnitureStore to play around with.
BeTheme’s own page builder is another rave-worthy feature. BeBuilder is fast, stable, and user-friendly. What’s more, you can edit any part of your website — including things like the header, footer, and WooCommerce content — with it.
Here are some more reasons to give BeTheme a try:
Average rating: 4.83 / 5
Customer testimonial: “Technical support is excellent. Clear, friendly, and always willing to help to solve any problem. It really pays to have the updated support subscription. Great service.”
TL;DR: Avada is the best WordPress theme for web designers and developers who want a flexible, feature-rich, all-in-one website building solution.
Avada isn’t so much a WordPress theme as it is a complete website builder solution. While this theme comes with 83 pre-built websites and more than 120 design elements, it’s the live visual builder that makes this theme one of the best options for 2024.
Take something like Avada’s pre-built eBike website. Using the live builder, you could easily repurpose this template for other types of small ecommerce shops. And it would feel as though you’re editing it on the website instead of inside of WordPress.
There are other reasons why Avada is a fan favorite in the WordPress community:
Average rating: 4.78 / 5
Customer testimonial: “I am a web designer, and I purchased this builder for all my clients. I love it. I enjoy how flexible it is and all the ways I can mold different websites, and the many features it comes with, without purchasing anything extra. I’ve been using this builder since 2015 and it keeps getting better and better.”
TL;DR: Uncode is the best multiuse WordPress and WooCommerce theme for professional designers and agencies looking for a go-to solution for any project.
Uncode is one of those multipurpose themes that makes you never want to look at a plugin again. In terms of designing with Uncode, it comes with about 100 demos, 550 premade section wireframes, plus 85 content modules.
Whatever you can dream up, you’ll have an easy time recreating it with Uncode.
Shop Ajax is a great example of what you can do with Uncode. This ecommerce demo is attractive and full of all the features you’d need to improve your customers’ shopping experience (like filters, hover-revealed options, logo integration, and so on).
It’s this level of attention to detail that makes Uncode one of the top WordPress themes.
Here are some other reasons to try Uncode:
Average rating: 4.89 / 5
Customer testimonial: “It is the best WordPress theme out there and the support is top notch (amazing response times and knowledge from their support team). The way it is built is smart and intuitive. Truly easy to use and consistent in all its options. I love it!”
TL;DR: Blocksy is the best free WordPress theme in 2024 for building beautiful, lightweight websites.
Blocksy is a freemium WordPress theme unlike any other. What’s most notable about it is that it is lightning fast — not just to use, but the websites you design with it, too. With performance playing such a big role in SEO these days, this is a big deal.
Blocksy-built websites aren’t just fast. They’re also built with beautiful aesthetics. Take, for instance, the Persona starter site. Modern users will love the dark theme and classy layout.
Anyone editing these starter sites will fall in love with Blocksy, too. This WordPress theme works with the top page builders — WordPress’s Gutenberg, Elementor, Beaver Builder, and Brizy.
There are other reasons why you’ll enjoy working with Blocksy:
Average rating: 5 / 5
Customer testimonial: “Blocksy is fast and light, responsive and beautiful. Blocksy has nothing superfluous and has everything you need. I love Blocksy, and Blocksy loves me.”
TL;DR: Total is the best WordPress theme for web designers and developers seeking the flexibility to design from-scratch as well as to use time-saving templates.
Total is the total package. You can build any type of website you want, regardless of your skill level. You also have the ability to design it from-scratch using the WPBakery live customizer or to start with a fully editable and professionally designed template.
Have a look at the Reach demo and you’ll get a sense for the types of designs you can come up with for businesses. In this case, the basic look and layout are smart choices. They’re what make this service provider’s portfolio really pop.
Visit Total’s website and you’ll see how diverse and complex the other demos are. The possibilities will feel endless with Total. And when you’re building websites for dozens of clients every year, that’s important.
Here are other reasons why Total will be one of the best WordPress themes in 2024:
Average rating: 4.86 / 5
Customer testimonial: “Among several themes purchased from ThemeForest, I can say Total theme is the only theme that I can recommend. It is a fast theme with most options already built in, and the support is excellent.”
TL;DR: Litho is the best WordPress theme for users of all experience levels wanting to use a theme that’s well-built and supported.
Litho is one of the best WordPress themes for 2024 for numerous reasons. The one that stands out the most is the level of customer support.
While every great theme has a great team behind it, Litho goes the extra mile when it comes to user support. Whether you have questions about how to get started or experience an issue, you can expect customer service to be super friendly, fast, and capable of solving your problem.
This makes Litho an especially good choice for novice WordPress users and professional designers alike.
Plus, with dedicated support behind you, you won’t feel limited in what you do with the theme. Whether you want to create a startup site or something more complex, someone will be there to help you when you need it.
Here are some more reasons Litho is a good choice:
Average rating: 4.94 / 5
Customer testimonial: “I’m absolutely thrilled with Litho. Its flexibility and customization options allowed me to create a unique and visually stunning website that perfectly fits my vision. The remarkable customer support provided by the team is incredibly responsive, genuinely friendly, and exceptionally helpful.”
TL;DR: Rey is the best WordPress theme for designing full-featured, high-converting ecommerce websites.
Rey is a stylish and modern alternative to WooCommerce’s collection of themes. It’s also a great option if you’re tired of having to outfit great-looking WordPress themes with all the ecommerce features and functionality they’re missing.
Take a glance at the San Francisco demo and you’ll see how incredible these ecommerce sites are. With designs that rival those of luxury brands and wow-inducing product pages, websites built with Rey are sure to impress visitors and turn them into customers.
This WordPress theme seamlessly integrates with Elementor. If you’re familiar with this page builder plugin, then you know how easy it’s going to be to customize any Rey demo you use.
Speaking of customization, here are other reasons why you should consider using Rey:
Average rating: 4.98 / 5
Customer testimonial: “This is by FAR the best theme I have ever purchased from here. So easy to modify, and if you stumble across a roadblock the dev is quick to help!”
TL;DR: WoodMart is the best WooCommerce theme for niche ecommerce design.
WoodMart is a fantastic option if you’re looking to build a niche ecommerce website that is uniquely your own.
This WooCommerce theme comes with more than 80 pre-built demo sites. You’ll find sites for businesses like video game companies, food delivery services, coffee retailers, and furniture stores — like the Furniture 2 demo.
These demos and the hundreds of templates included in the theme are easy to customize. From a global level down to each element on the page, WoodMart gives you all the options and settings needed to customize your designs as much or as little as you need to.
If you get stuck, there’s a search feature built into the settings to help you find the exact setting you need. The theme documentation is helpful, too, if you’re ever feeling stuck or wondering what more you can do.
Here are some other benefits to using WoodMart to design your online shop:
Average rating: 4.93 / 5
Customer testimonial: “A theme could only be this quality, pleasant, practical, professional, wonderful, and tremendous. I don’t know how else to express it. This is truly a work of art designed and programmed with great effort. Some might think I’m exaggerating, but I can clearly say this. It’s the best WordPress theme on ThemeForest, even in the world.”
TL;DR: Impeka is the best WordPress theme for anyone wanting to spend more time designing and creating content instead of trying to master the theme itself.
Impeka has so many great things going for it. But one thing that can’t be denied is how easy Impeka is to use.
That’s not always something you find when using multipurpose WordPress themes. Yet, Impeka’s developer found a way to create a feature-packed and completely customizable theme without making it difficult for users to learn how to use it.
Special attention really does need to be paid to the theme developers. In addition to creating an easy-to-use theme, they provide great support for it, too.
For starters, the theme is updated often and new pre-built sites like the elegant Design Agency Demo are released every month. Secondly, the comprehensive support options and instantaneous customer support are rave-worthy.
Here are some other reasons why users love Impeka so much:
Average rating: 4.98 / 5
Customer testimonial: “The theme is very flexible and there are endless possibilities to how it is used which the incredible support team are happy to help navigate. I can’t believe how quick and thoroughly responsive the team are. It’s refreshing to get such great support.”
TL;DR: XStore is the best WooCommerce theme for designers and agencies looking to build high-converting online stores.
XStore is a fantastic choice if you’re looking for a WooCommerce theme you can use for a multitude of online stores. With more than 130 pre-built websites and Coming Soon pages, you’ll be able to get your store up and running quickly.
The Minimal Electronics pre-built site is a good example of the quality of designs you’ll find when you install XStore.
A great ecommerce theme has to do more than just look good. It also needs to include the right features for your shoppers.
In addition to the common functionality needed to run an ecommerce site, XStore also comes with a collection of high-converting features. Product variation swatches, live viewing counters, shopping cart countdowns, and free shipping progress bars, for instance, will help you capture more sales.
Here are some other reasons you might want to use XStore for ecommerce design:
Average rating: 4.87 / 5
Customer testimonial: “I can’t express how thrilled I am with the XStore WordPress theme! It’s truly a game-changer for my website. From the moment I installed it, I was blown away by its stunning design and powerful features.”
With tens of thousands of great WordPress themes available, you might feel overwhelmed when it comes time to settle on one. Especially if you’re thinking about purchasing a theme.
However, the best WordPress themes are easy to find if you know what you’re looking for.
If you want to narrow down your search, start with this compilation of 11 top WordPress themes for 2024. Each of them has something special to offer.
Just to recap:
WordPress Theme | Summary | Standout Feature |
UiCore PRO | UiCore PRO is a WordPress theme tailored explicitly for agencies looking to build unlimited websites under one yearly subscription. | Unlimited Websites |
BeTheme | BeTheme is the best WordPress theme for designers who want one theme for all their websites. | Pre-built website collection |
Avada | Avada is the best WordPress theme for web designers and developers who want a flexible, feature-rich, all-in-one website building solution. | Live visual builder |
Uncode | Uncode is the best multiuse WordPress and WooCommerce theme for professional designers and agencies looking for a go-to solution for any project. | Website building components |
Blocksy | Blocksy is the best free WordPress theme in 2024 for building beautiful, lightweight websites. | Website speed |
Total | Total is the best WordPress theme for web designers and developers seeking the flexibility to design from-scratch as well as to use time-saving templates. | Endless possibilities |
Litho | Litho is the best WordPress theme for users of all experience levels wanting to use a theme that’s well-built and supported. | Customer support |
Rey | Rey is the best WordPress theme for designing full-featured, high-converting ecommerce websites. | eCommerce features |
Woodmart | WoodMart is the best WooCommerce theme for niche ecommerce design. | Deep customization |
Impeka | Impeka is the best WordPress theme for anyone wanting to spend more time designing and creating content instead of trying to master the theme itself. | Ease of use |
XStore | XStore is the best WooCommerce theme for designers and agencies looking to build high-converting online stores. | Conversion features |
The reviews above are a good place to start. But don’t let your research stop there.
Spend some time previewing the themes and their page builders (if they have their own). Also, check out the available demos, starters sites, or pre-built websites.
You’ll be able to get a good sense for which theme will suit your needs best once you spend some time with it.
[- This is a sponsored post on behalf of BAW media -]
I sat down with Heydon Pickering in the most recent episode of the Smashing Hour. Full transparency: I was nervous as heck. I’ve admired Heydon’s work for years, and even though we run in similar circles, this was our first time meeting. You know how you build some things up in your mind and sorta psyche yourself out? Yeah, that.
Heydon is nothing short of a gentleman and, I’ll be darned, easy to talk to. As is the case with any Smashing Hour, there’s no script, no agenda, no nothing. We find ourselves getting into the weeds of accessibility testing and documentation — or the lack of it — before sliding into the stuff he’s really interested in and excited about today: styling sound. Dude pulled out a demo and walked me (and everyone else) through the basics of the Web Audio API and how he’s using it to visualize sounds in tons of groovy ways that I now want hooked up to my turntable somehow.
Smashing Hour With Heydon Pickering originally published on CSS-Tricks, which is part of the DigitalOcean family. You should get the newsletter.
There is an amazing community effort happening in search of a new logo for CSS. I was a bit skeptical at first, as I never really considered CSS a “brand.” Why does it need a logo? For starters, the current logo seems… a bit dated.
Displayed quite prominently is the number 3. As in CSS version 3, or simply CSS3. Depending on your IDE’s selected icon pack of choice, CSS file icons are often only the number 3.
To give an incredibly glossed-over history of CSS3:
CSS is certainly not stuck in 2011. Take a look at all the features added to CSS in the past five years (warning, scrolling animation ahead):
(Courtesy of Alex Riviere)
Seems like this stems mainly from the discontinuation of version numbering for CSS. These days, we mostly reference newer CSS features by their individual specification level, such as Selectors Level 4 being the current Selectors specification, for example.
A far more general observation on the “progress” of CSS could be taking a look at features being implemented — things like Caniuse and Baseline are great for seeing when certain browsers implemented certain features. Similarly, the Interop Project is a group consisting of browsers figuring out what to implement next.
There are ongoing discussions about the “eras” of CSS, though, and how those may be a way of framing the way we refer to CSS features.
Chris posted about CSS4 here on CSS-Tricks (five years ago!), discussing how successful CSS3 was from a marketing perspective. Jen Simmons also started a discussion back in 2020 on the CSS Working Group’s GitHub about defining CSS4. Knowing that, are you at least somewhat surprised that we have blown right by CSS4 and are technically using CSS5?
The CSS-Next Community Group is leading the charge here, something that member Brecht de Ruyte introduced earlier this year at Smashing Magazine. The purpose of this group is to, well, determine what’s next for CSS! The group defines the CSS versions as:
Check out this slide deck from November 2023 detailing the need for defining stronger versioning. Their goals are clear in my opinion:
Circling back around to the logo, I have to agree: Yes, it’s time for a change.
Back in August, Adam Argyle opened an issue on the CSS-Next project on GitHub to drum up ideas. The thread is active and ongoing, though appears to be honing in on a release candidate. Let’s take a look at some proposals!
Nils Binder, from 9elements, proposed this lovely design, riffing on the “cascade.” Note the river-like “S” shape flowing through the design.
Chris Kirk-Nielson pitched a neat interactive logo concept he put together a while back. The suggestion plays into the “CSS is Awesome” meme, where the content overflows the wrapper. While playful and recognizable, Nils raised an excellent point:
Regarding the reference to the ‘CSS IS AWESOME’ meme, I initially chuckled, of course. However, at the same time, the meme also represents CSS as something quirky, unpredictable, and full of bugs. I’m not sure if that’s the exact message that needs to be repeated in the logo. It feels like it reinforces the recurring ‘CSS is broken’ mantra. To exaggerate: CSS is subordinate to JS and somehow broken.
Wow, is this the end of an era for the familiar meme?
It’s looking that way, as the current candidate builds off of Javi Aguilar’s proposal. Javi’s design is being iterated upon by the group, it’s shaping up and looks great hanging with friends:
Javi describes the design considerations in the thread. Personally, I’m a fan of the color choice, and the softer shape differentiates it from the more rigid JavaScript and Typescript logos.
As mentioned, the discussion is ongoing and the design is actively being worked on. You can check out the latest versions in Adam’s CodePen demo:
Or if checking out design files is more your speed, take a look in Figma.
I think the thing that impresses me most about community initiatives like this is the collaboration involved. If you have opinions on the design of the logo, feel free to chime in on the discussion thread!
Once the versions are defined and the logo finalized, the only thing left to decide on will be a mascot for CSS. A chameleon? A peacock? I’m sure the community will choose wisely.
Searching for a New CSS Logo originally published on CSS-Tricks, which is part of the DigitalOcean family. You should get the newsletter.
We’ve got goodies for designers, developers, SEO-ers, content managers, and those of you who wear multiple hats. And, of course, it wouldn’t be October without a Halloween themed font. Enjoy!
Feeedy is a notes app that offers the convenience of messaging apps with enhanced note-taking features.
Email sign ups can go wrong for a number of reasons, like fake addresses and typos. RealMail provides email validation that is easily configurable and fast to implement.
The Syncly platform could help you pinpoint and eliminate causes of customer dissatisfaction by using AI to analyze and categorize user feedback automatically.
If you need to do a lot of user testing but don’t have the budget, Personno will let you create AI respondents for fast results. It’s due to launch in Beta in the next couple of weeks.
FluidSEO is an SEO plugin for Webflow. As well as the usual SEO help such as page audits, Fluid SEO can implement changes and suggestions for you, and run tasks in bulk.
bcons is a php console that is added to your browser devtools. Inspect variable values, errors, and warnings without wading through error logs and var dumps. It currently works with Chromium and mozilla browsers.
Airbounce aims to simplify using Zoom by turning your Mac’s caps lock key into a control switch. Press it to join or leave calls, and while on a call, use it to toggle mute. And as a bonus, the light will indicate whether you’re muted.
There are a ton of task managers and to-do lists out there, but Done is one of the simplest. It has a very minimal UI which at the same time is intuitive and easy to use. It allows you to create task groups, set reminders, and push unfinished tasks to the next day.
This fun, lettering font is clearly inspired by old monster movie posters. It comes in three variants, and includes Opentype ligatures.
PowerCharts records your Mac’s battery health and performance and visualizes it in easy-to-read charts. Taking control of battery levels, consumption rates, maximum capacity, and level distribution over time may help you improve the battery life.
We all do it: turn to our phones for a quick break, then get hooked on social feeds or games. Clearspace prompts you to pause before opening your worst habit apps and take a few deep breaths. On the iPhone version, you can even set it to make you do some physical exercise first.
Cursor is an AI code editor. Its autocomplete offers suggestions based on your most recent edits, and it will write code from natural language prompts. It can speed up development by taking over the grunt work, but you do still need to know code.
Magic Inspector’s AI lets you create, run, and schedule automated browser tests using natural language, without needing to be a developer.
Strapi headless CMS has been around for a while now, and last week saw the launch of version 5.0, with a whole host of major improvements for developers and for content managers.
This Chrome extension groups tabs by domain, subdomain, or custom rules, to to help minimize browser clutter. You can set custom colors for each tab group, and sort by title or domain.
Not long ago, if we wanted a tooltip or popover positioned on top of another element, we would have to set our tooltip’s position to something other than static
and use its inset/transform properties to place it exactly where we want. This works, but the element’s position is susceptible to user scrolls, zooming, or animations since the tooltip could overflow off of the screen or wind up in an awkward position. The only way to solve this was using JavaScript to check whenever the tooltip goes out of bounds so we can correct it… again in JavaScript.
CSS Anchor Positioning gives us a simple interface to attach elements next to others just by saying which sides to connect — directly in CSS. It also lets us set a fallback position so that we can avoid the overflow issues we just described. For example, we might set a tooltip element above its anchor but allow it to fold underneath the anchor when it runs out of room to show it above.
Anchor positioning is different from a lot of other features as far as how quickly it’s gained browser support: its first draft was published on June 2023 and, just a year later, it was released on Chrome 125. To put it into perspective, the first draft specification for CSS variables was published in 2012, but it took four years for them to gain wide browser support.
So, let’s dig in and learn about things like attaching target elements to anchor elements and positioning and sizing them.
/* Define an anchor element */
.anchor {
anchor-name: --my-anchor;
}
/* Anchor a target element */
.target {
position: absolute;
position-anchor: --my-anchor;
}
/* Position a target element */
.target {
position-area: start end;
}
At its most basic, CSS Anchor Positioning introduces a completely new way of placing elements on the page relative to one another. To make our lives easier, we’re going to use specific names to clarify which element is connecting to which:
For the following code examples and demos, you can think of these as just two
<div class="anchor">anchor</div>
<div class="target">target</div>
CSS Anchor Positioning is all about elements with absolute positioning (i.e., display: absolute
), so there are also some concepts we have to review before diving in.
static
or certain values in properties like contain
or filter
.top
, right
, bottom
, left
, etc.) reduce the size of the containing block into which it is sized and positioned, resulting in a new box called the inset-modified containing block, or IMCB for short. This is a vital concept to know since properties we’re covering in this guide — like position-area
and position-try-order
— rely on this concept.We’ll first look at the two properties that establish anchor positioning. The first, anchor-name
, establishes the anchor element, while the second, position-anchor
, attaches a target element to the anchor element.
anchor-name
A normal element isn’t an anchor by default — we have to explicitly make an element an anchor. The most common way is by giving it a name, which we can do with the anchor-name
property.
anchor-name: none | <dashed-ident>#
The name must be a , that is, a custom name prefixed with two dashes (
--
), like --my-anchor
or --MyAnchor
.
.anchor {
anchor-name: --my-anchor;
}
This gives us an anchor element. All it needs is something anchored to it. That’s what we call the “target” element which is set with the position-anchor
property.
position-anchor
The target element is an element with an absolute position linked to an anchor element matching what’s declared on the anchor-name
property. This attaches the target element to the anchor element.
position-anchor: auto | <anchor-element>
It takes a valid . So, if we establish another element as the “anchor” we can set the target with the
position-anchor
property:
.target {
position: absolute;
position-anchor: --my-anchor;
}
Normally, if a valid anchor element isn’t found, then other anchor properties and functions will be ignored.
Now that we know how to establish an anchor-target relationship, we can work on positioning the target element in relation to the anchor element. The following two properties are used to set which side of the anchor element the target is positioned on (position-area
) and conditions for hiding the target element when it runs out of room (position-visibility
).
position-area
The next step is positioning our target relative to its anchor. The easiest way is to use the position-area
property, which creates an imaginary 3×3 grid around the anchor element and lets us place the target in one or more regions of the grid.
position-area: auto | <position-area>
It works by setting the row and column of the grid using logical values like start
and end
(dependent on the writing mode); physical values like top
, left
, right
, bottom
and the center
shared value, then it will shrink the target’s IMCB into the region of the grid we chose.
.target {
position-area: top right;
/* or */
position-area: start end;
}
Logical values refer to the containing block’s writing mode, but if we want to position our target relative to its writing mode we would prefix it with the self
value.
.target {
position-area: self-start self-end;
}
There is also the center
value that can be used in every axis.
.target {
position-area: center right;
/* or */
position-area: start center;
}
To place a target across two adjacent grid regions, we can use the prefix span-
on any value (that isn’t center
) a row or column at a time.
.target {
position-area: span-top left;
/* or */
position-area: span-start start;
}
Finally, we can span a target across three adjacent grid regions using the span-all
value.
.target {
position-area: bottom span-all;
/* or */
position-area: end span-all;
}
You may have noticed that the position-area
property doesn’t have a strict order for physical values; writing position-area: top left
is the same as position-area: left top
, but the order is important for logical value since position-area: start end
is completely opposite to position-area: end start
.
We can make logical values interchangeable by prefixing them with the desired axis using y-
, x-
, inline-
or block-
.
.target {
position-area: inline-end block-start;
/* or */
position-area: y-start x-end;
}
position-visibility
It provides certain conditions to hide the target from the viewport.
position-visibility: always | anchors-visible | no-overflow
always
: The target is always displayed without regard for its anchors or its overflowing status.no-overflow
: If even after applying the position fallbacks, the target element is still overflowing its containing block, then it is strongly hidden.anchors-visible
: If the anchor (not the target) has completely overflowed its containing block or is completely covered by other elements, then the target is strongly hidden.position-visibility: always | anchors-visible | no-overflow
Once the target element is positioned against its anchor, we can give the target additional instructions that tell it what to do if it runs out of space. We’ve already looked at the position-visibility
property as one way of doing that — we simply tell the element to hide. The following two properties, however, give us more control to re-position the target by trying other sides of the anchor (position-try-fallbacks
) and the order in which it attempts to re-position itself (position-try-order
).
The two properties can be declared together with the position-try
shorthand property — we’ll touch on that after we look at the two constituent properties.
position-try-fallbacks
This property accepts a list of comma-separated position fallbacks that are tried whenever the target overflows out of space in its containing block. The property attempts to reposition itself using each fallback value until it finds a fit or runs out of options.
position-try-fallbacks: none | [ [<dashed-ident> || <try-tactic>] | <'inset-area'> ]#
none
: Leaves the target’s position options list empty.
: Adds to the options list a custom @position-try
fallback with the given name. If there isn’t a matching @position-try
, the value is ignored.
: Creates an option list by flipping the target’s current position on one of three axes, each defined by a distinct keyword. They can also be combined to add up their effects.
flip-block
keyword swaps the values in the block axis.flip-inline
keyword swaps the values in the inline axis.flip-start
keyword swaps the values diagonally.
|| :
Combines a custom @try-option
and a
to create a single-position fallback. The
keywords can also be combined to sum up their effects.
Uses the position-area
syntax to move the anchor to a new position..target {
position-try-fallbacks:
--my-custom-position,
--my-custom-position flip-inline,
bottom left;
}
position-try-order
This property chooses a new position from the fallback values defined in the position-try-fallbacks
property based on which position gives the target the most space. The rest of the options are reordered with the largest available space coming first.
position-try-order: normal | most-width | most-height | most-block-size | most-inline-size
What exactly does “more space” mean? For each position fallback, it finds the IMCB size for the target. Then it chooses the value that gives the IMCB the widest or tallest size, depending on which option is selected:
most-width
most-height
most-block-size
most-inline-size
.target {
position-try-fallbacks: --custom-position, flip-start;
position-try-order: most-width;
}
position-try
This is a shorthand property that combines the position-try-fallbacks
and position-try-order
properties into a single declaration. It accepts first the order and then the list of possible position fallbacks.
position-try: < "position-try-order" >? < "position-try-fallbacks" >;
So, we can combine both properties into a single style rule:
.target {
position-try: most-width --my-custom-position, flip-inline, bottom left;
}
@position-try
This at-rule defines a custom position fallback for the position-try-fallbacks
property.
@position-try <dashed-ident> {
<declaration-list>
}
It takes various properties for changing a target element’s position and size and grouping them as a new position fallback for the element to try.
Imagine a scenario where you’ve established an anchor-target relationship. You want to position the target element against the anchor’s top-right edge, which is easy enough using the position-area
property we saw earlier:
.target {
position: absolute;
position-area: top right;
width: 100px;
}
See how the .target
is sized at 100px
? Maybe it runs out of room on some screens and is no longer able to be displayed at anchor’s the top-right edge. We can supply the .target
with the fallbacks we looked at earlier so that it attempts to re-position itself on an edge with more space:
.target {
position: absolute;
position-area: top right;
position-try-fallbacks: top left;
position-try-order: most-width;
width: 100px;
}
And since we’re being good CSSer’s who strive for clean code, we may as well combine those two properties with the position-try
shorthand property:
.target {
position: absolute;
position-area: top right;
position-try: most-width, flip-inline, bottom left;
width: 100px;
}
So far, so good. We have an anchored target element that starts at the top-right corner of the anchor at 100px
. If it runs out of space there, it will look at the position-try
property and decide whether to reposition the target to the anchor’s top-left corner (declared as flip-inline
) or the anchor’s bottom-left corner — whichever offers the most width.
But what if we want to simulataneously re-size the target element when it is re-positioned? Maybe the target is simply too dang big to display at 100px
at either fallback position and we need it to be 50px
instead. We can use the @position-try
to do exactly that:
@position-try --my-custom-position {
position-area: top left;
width: 50px;
}
With that done, we now have a custom property called --my-custom-position
that we can use on the position-try
shorthand property. In this case, @position-try
can replace the flip-inline
value since it is the equivalent of top left
:
@position-try --my-custom-position {
position-area: top left;
width: 50px;
}
.target {
position: absolute;
position-area: top right;
position-try: most-width, --my-custom-position, bottom left;
width: 100px;
}
This way, the .target
element’s width is re-sized from 100px
to 50px
when it attempts to re-position itself to the anchor’s top-right edge. That’s a nice bit of flexibility that gives us a better chance to make things fit together in any layout.
anchor()
You might think of the CSS anchor()
function as a shortcut for attaching a target element to an anchor element — specify the anchor, the side we want to attach to, and how large we want the target to be in one fell swoop. But, as we’ll see, the function also opens up the possibility of attaching one target element to multiple anchor elements.
This is the function’s formal syntax, which takes up to three arguments:
anchor( <anchor-element>? && <anchor-side>, <length-percentage>? )
So, we’re identifying an anchor element, saying which side we want the target to be positioned on, and how big we want it to be. It’s worth noting that anchor()
can only be declared on inset-related properties (e.g. top
, left
, inset-block-end
, etc.)
.target {
top: anchor(--my-anchor bottom);
left: anchor(--my-anchor end, 50%);
}
Let’s break down the function’s arguments.
This argument specifies which anchor element we want to attach the target to. We can supply it with either the anchor’s name (see “Attaching targets to anchors”).
We also have the choice of not supplying an anchor at all. In that case, the target element uses an implicit anchor element defined in position-anchor
. If there isn’t an implicit anchor, the function resolves to its fallback. Otherwise, it is invalid and ignored.
This argument sets which side of the anchor we want to position the target element to, e.g. the anchor’s top
, left
, bottom
, right
, etc.
But we have more options than that, including logical side keywords (inside
, outside
), logical direction arguments relative to the user’s writing mode (start
, end
, self-start
, self-end
) and, of course, center
.
: Resolves to the
of the corresponding side of the anchor element. It has physical arguments (top
, left
, bottom
right
), logical side arguments (inside
, outside
), logical direction arguments relative to the user’s writing mode (start
, end
, self-start
, self-end
) and the center
argument.
: Refers to the position between the start
(0%
) and end
(100%
). Values below 0%
and above 100%
are allowed.This argument is totally optional, so you can leave it out if you’d like. Otherwise, use it as a way of re-sizing the target elemenrt whenever it doesn’t have a valid anchor or position. It positions the target to a fixed or
relative to its containing block.
Let’s look at examples using different types of arguments because they all do something a little different.
Physical arguments (top
, right
, bottom
, left
) can be used to position the target regardless of the user’s writing mode. For example, we can position the right
and bottom
inset properties of the target at the anchor(top)
and anchor(left)
sides of the anchor, effectively positioning the target at the anchor’s top-left corner:
.target {
bottom: anchor(top);
right: anchor(left);
}
Logical side arguments (i.e., inside
, outside
), are dependent on the inset property they are in. The inside
argument will choose the same side as its inset property, while the outside
argument will choose the opposite. For example:
.target {
left: anchor(outside);
/* is the same as */
left: anchor(right);
top: anchor(inside);
/* is the same as */
top: anchor(top);
}
Logical direction arguments are dependent on two factors:
start
, end
) or the target’s own writing mode (self-start
, self-end
).So for example, using physical inset properties in a left-to-right horizontal writing would look like this:
.target {
left: anchor(start);
/* is the same as */
left: anchor(left);
top: anchor(end);
/* is the same as */
top: anchor(bottom);
}
In a right-to-left writing mode, we’d do this:
.target {
left: anchor(start);
/* is the same as */
left: anchor(right);
top: anchor(end);
/* is the same as */
top: anchor(bottom);
}
That can quickly get confusing, so we should also use logical arguments with logical inset properties so the writing mode is respected in the first place:
.target {
inset-inline-start: anchor(end);
inset-block-start: anchor(end);
}
Percentages can be used to position the target from any point between the start
(0%
) and end
(100%
) sides. Since percentages are relative to the user writing mode, is preferable to use them with logical inset properties.
.target {
inset-inline-start: anchor(100%);
/* is the same as */
inset-inline-start: anchor(end);
inset-block-end: anchor(0%);
/* is the same as */
inset-block-end: anchor(start);
}
Values smaller than 0%
and bigger than 100%
are accepted, so -100%
will move the target towards the start and 200%
towards the end.
.target {
inset-inline-start: anchor(200%);
inset-block-end: anchor(-100%);
}
The center
argument is equivalent to 50%
. You could say that it’s “immune” to direction, so there is no problem if we use it with physical or logical inset properties.
.target {
position: absolute;
position-anchor: --my-anchor;
left: anchor(center);
bottom: anchor(top);
}
anchor-size()
The anchor-size()
function is unique in that it sizes the target element relative to the size of the anchor element. This can be super useful for ensuring a target scales in size with its anchor, particularly in responsive designs where elements tend to get shifted, re-sized, or obscured from overflowing a container.
The function takes an anchor’s side and resolves to its , essentially returning the anchor’s
width
, height
, inline-size
or block-size
.
anchor-size( [ <anchor-element> || <anchor-size> ]? , <length-percentage>? )
Here are the arguments that can be used in the anchor-size()
function:
: Refers to the side of the anchor element.
: This optional argument can be used as a fallback whenever the target doesn’t have a valid anchor or size. It returns a fixed
or
relative to its containing block.And we can declare the function on the target element’s width
and height
properties to size it with the anchor — or both at the same time!
.target {
width: anchor-size(width, 20%); /* uses default anchor */`
height: anchor-size(--other-anchor inline-size, 100px);
}
We learned about the anchor()
function in the last section. One of the function’s quirks is that we can only declare it on inset-based properties, and all of the examples we saw show that. That might sound like a constraint of working with the function, but it’s actually what gives anchor()
a superpower that anchor positioning properties don’t: we can declare it on more than one inset-based property at a time. As a result, we can set the function multiple anchors on the same target element!
Here’s one of the first examples of the anchor()
function we looked at in the last section:
.target {
top: anchor(--my-anchor bottom);
left: anchor(--my-anchor end, 50%);
}
We’re declaring the same anchor element named --my-anchor
on both the top
and left
inset properties. That doesn’t have to be the case. Instead, we can attach the target element to multiple anchor elements.
.anchor-1 { anchor-name: --anchor-1; }
.anchor-2 { anchor-name: --anchor-2; }
.anchor-3 { anchor-name: --anchor-3; }
.anchor-4 { anchor-name: --anchor-4; }
.target {
position: absolute;
inset-block-start: anchor(--anchor-1);
inset-inline-end: anchor(--anchor-2);
inset-block-end: anchor(--anchor-3);
inset-inline-start: anchor(--anchor-4);
}
Or, perhaps more succintly:
.anchor-1 { anchor-name: --anchor-1; }
.anchor-2 { anchor-name: --anchor-2; }
.anchor-3 { anchor-name: --anchor-3; }
.anchor-4 { anchor-name: --anchor-4; }
.target {
position: absolute;
inset: anchor(--anchor-1) anchor(--anchor-2) anchor(--anchor-3) anchor(--anchor-4);
}
The following demo shows a target element attached to two elements that are registered anchors. A
allows you to click and drag it to change its dimensions. The two of them are absolutely positioned in opposite corners of the page. If we attach the target to each anchor, we can create an effect where resizing the anchors stretches the target all over the place almost like a tug-o-war between the two anchors.
The demo is only supported in Chrome at the time we’re writing this guide, so let’s drop in a video so you can see how it works.
The most straightforward use case for anchor positioning is for making tooltips, info boxes, and popovers, but it can also be used for decorative stuff. That means anchor positioning doesn’t have to establish a semantic relationship between the anchor and target elements. You can probably spot the issue right away: non-visual devices, like screen readers, are left in the dark about how to interpret two seemingly unrelated elements.
As an example, let’s say we have an element called .tooltip
that we’ve set up as a target element anchored to another element called .anchor
.
<div class="anchor">anchor</div>
<div class="toolip">toolip</div>
.anchor {
anchor-name: --my-anchor;
}
.toolip {
position: absolute;
position-anchor: --my-anchor;
position-area: top;
}
We need to set up a connection between the two elements in the DOM so that they share a context that assistive technologies can interpret and understand. The general rule of thumb for using ARIA attributes to describe elements is generally: don’t do it. Or at least avoid doing it unless you have no other semantic way of doing it.
This is one of those cases where it makes sense to reach for ARIA atributes. Before we do anything else, a screen reader currently sees the two elements next to one another without any remarking relationship. That’s a bummer for accessibility, but we can easily fix it using the corresponding ARIA attribute:
<div class="anchor" aria-describedby="tooltipInfo">anchor</div>
<div class="toolip" role="tooltip" id="tooltipInfo">toolip</div>
And now they are both visually and semantically linked together! If you’re new to ARIA attributes, you ought to check out Adam Silver’s “Why, How, and When to Use Semantic HTML and ARIA” for a great introduction.
This browser support data is from Caniuse, which has more detail. A number indicates that browser supports the feature at that version and up.
Chrome | Firefox | IE | Edge | Safari |
---|---|---|---|---|
125 | No | No | 125 | No |
Android Chrome | Android Firefox | Android | iOS Safari |
---|---|---|---|
129 | No | 129 | No |
CSS Anchor Positioning has undergone several changes since it was introduced as an Editor’s Draft. The Chrome browser team was quick to hop on board and implement anchor positioning even though the feature was still being defined. That’s caused confusion because Chromium-based browsers implemented some pieces of anchor positioning while the specification was being actively edited.
We are going to outline specific cases for you where browsers had to update their implementations in response to spec changes. It’s a bit confusing, but as of Chrome 129+, this is the stuff that was shipped but changed:
position-area
The inset-area
property was renamed to position-area
(#10209), but it will be supported until Chrome 131.
.target {
/* from */
inset-area: top right;
/* to */
position-area: top right;
}
position-try-fallbacks
The position-try-options
was renamed to position-try-fallbacks
(#10395).
.target {
/* from */
position-try-options: flip-block, --smaller-target;
/* to */
position-try-fallbacks: flip-block, --smaller-target;
}
inset-area()
The inset-area()
wrapper function doesn’t exist anymore for the position-try-fallbacks
(#10320), you can just write the values without the wrapper:
.target {
/* from */
position-try-options: inset-area(top left);
/* to */
position-try-fallbacks: top left;
}
anchor(center)
In the beginning, if we wanted to center a target from the center, we would have to write this convoluted syntax:
.target {
--center: anchor(--x 50%);
--half-distance: min(abs(0% - var(--center)), abs(100% - var(--center)));
left: calc(var(--center) - var(--half-distance));
right: calc(var(--center) - var(--half-distance));
}
The CWSSG working group resolved (#8979) to add the anchor(center)
argument to prevent us from having to do all that mental juggling:
.target {
left: anchor(center);
}
Yes, there are some bugs with CSS Anchor Positioning, at least at the time this guide is being written. For example, the specification says that if an element doesn’t have a default anchor element, then the position-area
does nothing. This is a known issue (#10500), but it’s still possible to replicate.
So, the following code…
.container {
position: relative;
}
.element {
position: absolute;
position-area: center;
margin: auto;
}
…will center the .element
inside its container, at least in Chrome:
Credit to Afif13 for that great demo!
Another example involves the position-visibility
property. If your anchor element is out of sight or off-screen, you typically want the target element to be hidden as well. The specification says that property’s the default value is anchors-visible
, but browsers default to always
instead.
The current implemenation in Chrome isn’t reflecting the spec; it indeed is using
always
as the initial value. But the spec is intentional: if your anchor is off-screen or otherwise scrolled off, you usually want it to hide. (#10425)
Almanac
on
Sep 17, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 12, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 8, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 14, 2024
.target { position-try-fallbacks: flip-inline, bottom left; }
Almanac
on
Sep 8, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 8, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 14, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 18, 2024
Almanac
on
Sep 28, 2024
CSS Anchor Positioning Guide originally published on CSS-Tricks, which is part of the DigitalOcean family. You should get the newsletter.